<resource xmlns:datacite="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4">
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName nameType="Personal">Florian Windhager</creatorName>
<givenName>Florian</givenName>
<familyName>Windhager</familyName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName nameType="Personal">Sibylle Moser</creatorName>
<givenName>Sibylle</givenName>
<familyName>Moser</familyName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName nameType="Personal">Simon Ganahl</creatorName>
<givenName>Simon</givenName>
<familyName>Ganahl</familyName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName nameType="Personal">Daniela de Angeli</creatorName>
<givenName>Daniela</givenName>
<familyName>de Angeli</familyName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName nameType="Personal">Eva Mayr</creatorName>
<givenName>Eva</givenName>
<familyName>Mayr</familyName>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title>Cultural Experience Design in Contested Times: A Controversy-Mapping Approach</title>
<title titleType="Subtitle">7th International Conference on Creative\Media/Technologies (IConCMT), 2025</title>
</titles>
<descriptions>
<description descriptionType="Other">Practitioners in cultural experience design (CXD) navigate a contested landscape: conceptual disputes about cultural value, design trade-offs without settled answers, evaluative fault lines shaped by politics and institutional convention. The field has accumulated no shared overview of this terrain. This paper introduces a controversy map as a first collective orientation instrument for that landscape, assembled through a transdisciplinary think tank and informed by controversy-mapping approaches from science and technology studies. Organized across three interrelated layers – conceptual, design-oriented, and evaluation-centered – the map renders major tensions visible as orientation axes for deliberate positioning. In polarized, platform-driven environments, it gives practitioners the overview they need to locate their own projects within the field’s disputes and stake out a position on their own terms.</description>
<description descriptionType="Other">This article has been double-blind peer reviewed.</description>
</descriptions>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">PDFDocument</resourceType>
<language>eng</language>
<dates>
<date dateType="Created">2026-08-17T13:24:04.105900074Z</date>
</dates>
<subjects>
<subject>Kulturerbe</subject>
<subject>Cultural heritage</subject>
<subject>ÖFOS 2012 -- GEISTESWISSENSCHAFTEN (6) -- Andere Geisteswissenschaften (605) -- Andere Geisteswissenschaften (6050) -- Kulturerbe (605008)</subject>
<subject>ÖFOS 2012 -- HUMANITIES (6) -- Other Humanities (605) -- Other Humanities (6050) -- Cultural heritage (605008)</subject>
<subject>Informationsdesign</subject>
<subject>Information design</subject>
<subject>ÖFOS 2012 -- NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN (1) -- Informatik (102) -- Informatik (1020) -- Informationsdesign (102014)</subject>
<subject>ÖFOS 2012 -- NATURAL SCIENCES (1) -- Computer Sciences (102) -- Computer Sciences (1020) -- Information design (102014)</subject>
<subject>Digital Humanities</subject>
<subject>Digital humanities</subject>
<subject>ÖFOS 2012 -- GEISTESWISSENSCHAFTEN (6) -- Andere Geisteswissenschaften (605) -- Andere Geisteswissenschaften (6050) -- Digital Humanities (605007)</subject>
<subject>ÖFOS 2012 -- HUMANITIES (6) -- Other Humanities (605) -- Other Humanities (6050) -- Digital humanities (605007)</subject>
<subject>Digitalisierung</subject>
<subject>Digitaler Wandel</subject>
<subject>Digitale Transformation</subject>
<subject>Museum</subject>
<subject>Öffentliche Sammlung &lt;Museum&gt;</subject>
<subject>Museen</subject>
<subject>Benutzererlebnis</subject>
<subject>Nutzererfahrung</subject>
<subject>Nutzererlebnis</subject>
<subject>User experience</subject>
<subject>Nutzungserlebnis</subject>
<subject>Cultural mediation</subject>
<subject>experience design</subject>
<subject>agonistic pluralism</subject>
<subject>transdisciplinary think tank</subject>
<subject>postdigital museum</subject>
<subject>controversy mapping</subject>
</subjects>
<sizes>
<size>463092 b</size>
</sizes>
<formats>
<format>application/pdf</format>
</formats>
<rightsList>
<rights rightsURI="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</rights>
</rightsList>
</resource>
